Agentic code review: from human gate to evidence and bounded autonomy

Backlinks

Park et al.: the work behind delegating to coding agentsupdated 2 OctSTALE: clean parallel merges can break a shared invariantupdated 2 OctDoes instruction make AI-assisted coding more effective, and what must humans know unaided?updated 1 OctRole shifts across the agentic software lifecycleupdated 1 OctWhen can an agent close an internal request without a manager?updated 1 OctGitHub gh-aw: an agent’s failure-investigation ticket is not resolved by closing itupdated 1 OctTrio study: code finished, understanding deferredupdated 1 OctPlanning and tracking agent work beyond ticketsupdated 30 SepFaire’s five-PR preview-build tool: planning beyond the ticket, outcome still unmeasuredupdated 30 SepAgentic coding adoption is social: testing a manager-and-team-artifacts hypothesisupdated 30 SepAnthropic’s Claude Code team: manager practice, pod autonomy, and review gatesupdated 30 SepSQLFluff Redshift GRANT: Copilot’s “safe to merge” fix underwent human rewriteupdated 29 SepSQLFluff’s DuckDB MAP literal: agent PR, recognized review gap, next-day human fixupdated 29 SepOpenAI Symphony: ticket-level planning replaces session babysitting, not outcome checksupdated 28 SepLinear’s March 2026 permission regression: a review/test-coverage failure without AI authoringupdated 28 SepAmplitude via Cursor: risk-tiered agent review in a customer-feedback pipelineupdated 28 SepLinear’s review habit: recover the customer problem before reading agentic diffsupdated 28 SepAfter merge: do agent PRs need more follow-up fixes?updated 28 Sep